Peer Review Process

TATHO: International Journal of Islamic Thought and Sciences implements the following peer review process :

1. Authors are advised to check for plagiarism and other copyright infringement before submitting.
2. Manuscripts submitted by the author will go through a review process by the editor, especially checking the suitability of the manuscript with the scope and template of the Journal. In this process, the editor will establish communication with the author so that the manuscript is worth sending to the reviewer or even returned/declined.
3. Manuscripts that have passed step 1 above are then sent to reviewers for content review using the double-blind peer review method.
4. The review will consider novelty, objectivity, methods, scientific impact, conclusions, and references.
5. Reviewers will suggest improvements and or acceptance/rejection of the article.
6. Considering the reviewers' suggestions, the editor will decide whether the manuscript meets the requirements of the TATHO journal.
7. The editor-in-chief's decision is final.
8. The entire review process is entirely OJS web-based.