An Epistemological Critique By Syed Naquid Al-Attas on The Relativism of Truth in Thomas Kuhn`s Paradigm
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70512/tatho.v2i4.145Keywords:
Syed Naquib al-Attas, Thomas Kuhn, Truth RelativismAbstract
This article examines the epistemological critique advanced by Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas against the concept of truth relativism inherent in Thomas Kuhn's theory of scientific paradigms. This study uses a library research method with a qualitative approach that is descriptive-analytical and comparative. According to Kuhn, scientific truth is relative to the paradigm adhered to by a scientific community, which encompasses a set of beliefs, values, and methods. As paradigms can shift through scientific revolutions, truth consequently becomes non-absolute and subject to change. In contrast, Syed Naquib al-Attas proposes an epistemology rooted in the Islamic tradition, wherein truth is considered absolute, objective, and derived from divine revelation. Al-Attas criticizes Kuhn's relativism because it disregards the metaphysical dimension of truth and potentially undermines the moral foundations and ultimate purpose of science. This study highlights the fundamental dichotomy between the secular-relativistic modern Western epistemology and an Islamic epistemology that upholds transcendent truth. As a solution, al-Attas proposes the project of the "Islamization of contemporary knowledge," a process of purifying knowledge by removing its secular, dualistic, and relativistic elements. Its ultimate aim is to restore science to its original function as a means to recognize the ultimate Truth (al-Haqq) and to serve God. Thus, the Islamization of knowledge is not merely a critique but a constructive proposal to the edifice of modern epistemology, which is perceived to have lost its spiritual and ethical compass.
Downloads
References
Al-Attas, M. N. (1995). Islam dan Filsafat Sains (iv). Mizan.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1981). Islam and Secularism. Pustaka.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1995). Islam and Secularisme. ISTAC.
Al-Attas, S. M. N. (2005). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam. ISTAC.
Al-Faruqi, A. R. H. (2015). Konsep Ilmu dalam Islam. Kalimah, 13(2), 223. https://doi.org/10.21111/klm.v13i2.286
Al-Haidary, Reza Hutama, Abbas Shofwan, R. H. M. (2024). Islamic Worldview as a Basic for Islamization of Science Concept According to Syed Muhammad Naquid Al-Attas. Etika Jurnalisme Pada Koran Kuning : Sebuah Studi Mengenai Koran Lampu Hijau, 18(1), 19–36.
Awang Darmawan Putra, R. D. (2016). Epistemologi Islamisasi Ilmu Syed Mohammad Naquib Al-Attas (Implikasinya Bagi Pemikiran dan Keilmuan). Fikrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 5(2), 1–23.
Bridgwater, W. (1963). The Columbia Encyclopedia (Edisi: thi). National Science Teachers Association.
Damayanti, S. N. (2019). Epistemologi Saintifik Thomas S. Kuhn terhadap Munculnya Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 1(3), 120. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v1i3.16192
Daud, W. M. N. W. (2019). Budaya Ilmu: Makna dan Manifestasi dalam Sejarah dan Masa Kini. CASIS.
Dinia, N., & Alafianta, N. F. (2022). The Object of Islamization of Contemporary Human Knowledge (IOCHK). Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 6(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v6i2.8246
Fahmy, H. (2012). Misykat:Refleksi tentang Westernisasi, Liberalisasidan Islam. INSIST-MIUMMI.
Hakim, U. (2019). Identifikasi Worldview dalam Ilmu Pengetahuan Barat Kontemporer menurut Syed Muhammad Naquib Al Attas. Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 3(2), 53–72.
Hamid Fahmy Zarkasyi. (2004). Agama dalam Pemikiran Barat Modern dan Postmodern. Dalam Islamisa.
Iqbal, A. M., Husna, S. W., Liandri, N. P., Wulandari, T., Erlina, R., & Harahap, S. S. A. (2023). Epistemologi Revolusi Sainstifik Thomas S. Khun. PRIMER : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(3), 348–353. https://doi.org/10.55681/primer.v1i3.155
James A. Marcum. (2005). Thomas Kuhn’s Revolution: An Historical Philosophy of Science. Coontinum.
Kamal, M. A. M. (2016). The Scientific Revolution of Thomas kuhn and Their Relevances for Humanization of Islamic Law. Syariati: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur`an Dan Hukum, 2(2), 213–226.
Kania, D. D. (2017). Pemikiran Epistemologi al-Attas. Jurnal Pemikian Dan Peradaban Islam ISLAMIA, XI(2), 16.
Kesuma, U., & Hidayat, A. W. (2020). Pemikiran Thomas S. Kuhn Teori Revolusi Paradigma. Islamadina : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 166. https://doi.org/10.30595/islamadina.v0i0.6043
Kuhn, T. (1926). Kuhn, Thomas S., 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolution 1962). Instituut Voor Theoretische Biologie.
Kuntowijoyo. (1991). Paradigma Islam; Interpretasi untuk Aksi. Penerbit Mizan.
Mahmudin, M., Ahmad, Z., & Basit, A. (2021). Islamic Epistemology Paradigm: Worldview of Interdisciplinary Islamic Studies Syed Muhammad Naqueb Al-Attas. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR), 23–42. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v2i1.41
Muslem. (2019). Konsep Islamisasi Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Penerapannya dalam Pendidikan Islam (Studi Pemikiran Syed Muhammad Naquib al-Attas). Tazkiya: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(2), 43.
Muslih, M. (2016). Filsafat Ilmu: Kajian atas Asumsi Dasar, Paradigma dan Kerangka Teori Ilmu Pengetahuan. LESFI.
Muslih, M. (2017). Rekonstruksi Metodologi Pengembangan Sains Berbasis Agama. Kalam, 11(2), 267–298. https://doi.org/10.24042/klm.v11i2.1795
Muslih, M., Susanto, H., & Perdana, M. P. (2021). The Paradigm of Islamization of Knowledge According to SMN Al-Attas (From Islamization of Science to Islamic Science). Tasfiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 5(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.21111/tasfiyah.v5i1.5269
Muslih, M., & Taqiyuddin, M. (2025). THE INTEGRATION OF SCIENCE AND RELIGION : ANALYSING RESEARCH PARADIGMS IN INDONESIAN STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITIES THROUGH A LAKATOSIAN LENS. 27(1), 165–202.
Muttaqien, G. A. (2019). Pandangan Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas Tentang Islamisasi Ilmu. Jaqfi: Jurnal Aqidah Dan Filsafat Islam, 4(2), 93–130. https://doi.org/10.15575/jaqfi.v4i2.9458
Nidzom, M. F. (2025). PROBLEM RELATIVISME KEBENARAN DI ERA POST-TRUTH : TINJAUAN EPISTEMOLOGIS THE PROBLEM OF TRUTH RELATIVISM IN THE POST-TRUTH ERA : AN EPISTEMOLOGICAL REVIEW. 11(01). https://doi.org/10.24235/jy.v11i1.19497
Nur, I. D., P. Ola, S., & Pahmi, S. (2024). Peran Filsafat Ilmu Tentang Konsep Teori Kebenaran Ilmiah. Jurnal BELAINDIKA (Pembelajaran Dan Inovasi Pendidikan), 6(3), 262–270. https://doi.org/10.52005/belaindika.v6i3.281
Nurkhalis, -. (2012). Konstruksi Teori Paradigma Thomas S. Kuhn. Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura, 11(02), 79. https://doi.org/10.22373/jiif.v11i02.55
Nursi, B. S. (2011). al-Kalimat (Terj. Ihsa). Soezler Publisher.
Ritzer, G. (2004). Sosiologi Pengetahuan Berparadigma Ganda ((terj). Al). Rajawali Press.
Rosnani Hashim, & Imron Rossidy. (2000). Islamization of Knowledge : A Comparative Analysis of the Conceptions of. Intellectual Discourse, 8(I), 19–44.
Rosyidah, R. I., Dewi, I. F., & Meldona, M. (2023). From Secular Capitalism to Spiritual Balance : The Relevance of Naquib Al-Attas ’ s Vision in Contemporary Economic Thought. Economica: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 14(2), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.21580/economica.2023.14.2.20891
Surajiyo, S., & Dhika, H. (2024). Relasi Ilmu dan Etika: Sebuah Kajian Filsafat Ilmu. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 8(3), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-humaniora.v8i3.4192
Ulya Inayatul, A. N. (2015). Pemikiran Thomas Kuhn dan Relevansinya Terhadap Keilmuan Islam. FIKRAH: Jurnal Ilmu Aqidah Dan Studi Keagamaan, 3(2 Desember 2015), 249–276.
Yusuf, M., & Haddade, H. (2021). Reformulating Islamic Epistemology: Solution to The Crisis of Modern Science, Technology and The Impact of Globalization. Ar-Raniry, International Journal of Islamic Studies, 8(1), 31–47. https://jurnal.ar-raniry.ac.id/index.php/jar/article/view/9790
Zainuddin, Z., Muttaqin, M., Amir, B., & Nafisah, A. (2025). Epistemological Synthesis of Al-Attas and Al-Faruqi : Islamization of Knowledge , Adab , and Contemporary Decolonization of Knowledge. 3, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.59966/isedu.v3i1.1834
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Sabilillah, Mulyo Rizky Ramadhani (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





